Print This Post Print This Post

Jun

30

Broadband access bandwagon [updated]


The Plain Dealer’s editorial from today.

Left of Ohio flagging this MSM report.

Update: Bill Callahan on the PD’s editorial, plus other insight.

What, if any, impact does the passage of SB117 have on this need? (yes, Bill, I mean you)

Bookmark and Share

By Jill Miller Zimon at 10:22 am June 30th, 2007 in Politics 

Comments

2 Responses to “Broadband access bandwagon [updated]”

  1. 1 Bill Callahan on June 30th, 2007 7:31 pm

    If the experience in other states is any guide, some places that already have AT&T ADSL will get faster VDSL (U-Verse), and then places that have both AT&T U-Verse and digital cable will start seeing bigger-bandwidth competition. Elsewhere (in non-AT&T areas, AT&T areas not targeted for U-Verse, etc.) SB 117 will change nothing — except that some low-income places may be abandoned by their cable providers altogether. Oh, and communities will start losing their fiber I-nets and other franchise services.

  2. 2 Jill on July 4th, 2007 9:59 pm

    Ok – so I’m being skipped over for UVerse but still have whatever AT&T offers that it got by buying sbcglobal. This is it, for me? Even though the UVerse thing is available all around me?

  • Writes Like She Tumbls

  • Voted into Top 25 Political Mom Blogs

  • Now on sale-WLST essay included!

  • Find Me On

  • RSS Posts About Pepper Pike City Council

  • 2010 WE Magazine 101 Women Bloggers to Watch

    Jill Miller Zimon,Blogging,WE Magazine

  • Category Specific RSS

    Pepper Pike
    Cleveland+
    Politics
    Women
    Ohio
    Elections
    Law
    Jewish
    by Tips and Tricks

  • BlogHer Guide to Political Blogging

  • Calendar

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Meta

  • Search Ohio Blogs

    BlogNetNews.com

    media_bloggers.bmp

    BlogBurst.com


    Visit The White House Project

  • Notorious Women through History


  • Our Bodies, Our Blog


  • Spam Blocked

"));