Comments on: Why being ferocious Michelle Malkin 24/7 can fail badly, by Max Factor III@CWRU http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/2007/09/19/why-being-ferocious-michelle-malkin-247-can-fail-badly-by-max-factor-iiicwru/ "She is very powerful, so be nice to her." Chancellor, Ohio Board of Regents, Eric Fingerhut Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:24:03 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Women & Guns and Ferociousness! Oh my! | Writes Like She Talks http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/2007/09/19/why-being-ferocious-michelle-malkin-247-can-fail-badly-by-max-factor-iiicwru/comment-page-1/#comment-30359 Women & Guns and Ferociousness! Oh my! | Writes Like She Talks Thu, 20 Sep 2007 12:19:45 +0000 http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/2007/09/19/why-being-ferocious-michelle-malkin-247-can-fail-badly-by-max-factor-iiicwru/#comment-30359 [...] Why being ferocious Michelle Malkin 24/7 can fail badly, by Max Factor III@CWRU [...] [...] Why being ferocious Michelle Malkin 24/7 can fail badly, by Max Factor III@CWRU [...]

]]> By: Jill Miller Zimon http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/2007/09/19/why-being-ferocious-michelle-malkin-247-can-fail-badly-by-max-factor-iiicwru/comment-page-1/#comment-30353 Jill Miller Zimon Thu, 20 Sep 2007 03:02:08 +0000 http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/2007/09/19/why-being-ferocious-michelle-malkin-247-can-fail-badly-by-max-factor-iiicwru/#comment-30353 Carole - I'm with you, not with them. ;) That's a joke, sort of. Yeah, you know - I've really really really lived my life trying to look at both or all sides. And I have met people who are nearly incapable of feeling empathy for others. But frankly, I think that's a real deficit in relating to people. Malkin seems to have some serious anger. And seriously, I cannot, simply cannot imagine being literally ferocious 24/7. What kind of environment does that foster? And that she can't write one sentence or paragraph that pays homage to the FEELING even if not the reality that yeah, you know what - if more women were in charge, there's a damn good chance things would be a lot different and very possibly better. We may never know - but then again, maybe we will. :) Carole – I’m with you, not with them. ;) That’s a joke, sort of.

Yeah, you know – I’ve really really really lived my life trying to look at both or all sides. And I have met people who are nearly incapable of feeling empathy for others. But frankly, I think that’s a real deficit in relating to people.

Malkin seems to have some serious anger. And seriously, I cannot, simply cannot imagine being literally ferocious 24/7. What kind of environment does that foster? And that she can’t write one sentence or paragraph that pays homage to the FEELING even if not the reality that yeah, you know what – if more women were in charge, there’s a damn good chance things would be a lot different and very possibly better.

We may never know – but then again, maybe we will. :)

]]> By: Carole Cohen http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/2007/09/19/why-being-ferocious-michelle-malkin-247-can-fail-badly-by-max-factor-iiicwru/comment-page-1/#comment-30350 Carole Cohen Thu, 20 Sep 2007 02:52:28 +0000 http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/2007/09/19/why-being-ferocious-michelle-malkin-247-can-fail-badly-by-max-factor-iiicwru/#comment-30350 Hi Jill. Yes, you can comment on her site but you have to be logged in and I don't want to give her any SEO. What kind of crap are they espousing? How do they know what Sally Field's style of mothering is? It's not even pertinent. How amazing to me that free speech is once again reduced to a 'them or us' mentality. How can anyone complain that she said women would rule in a way that included more diplomacy and other methods of conflict resolution? I think it's better if I don't comment there lol. Hi Jill. Yes, you can comment on her site but you have to be logged in and I don’t want to give her any SEO. What kind of crap are they espousing? How do they know what Sally Field’s style of mothering is? It’s not even pertinent. How amazing to me that free speech is once again reduced to a ‘them or us’ mentality. How can anyone complain that she said women would rule in a way that included more diplomacy and other methods of conflict resolution? I think it’s better if I don’t comment there lol.

]]>