<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Iowa, social networks beat political machine: analysis by network expect, local Valdis Krebs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/2008/01/05/in-iowa-social-networks-beat-political-machine-analysis-by-network-expect-local-valdis-krebs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/2008/01/05/in-iowa-social-networks-beat-political-machine-analysis-by-network-expect-local-valdis-krebs/</link>
	<description>&#34;She is very powerful, so be nice to her.&#34; Former Chancellor, Ohio Board of Regents, Eric Fingerhut</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:51:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/2008/01/05/in-iowa-social-networks-beat-political-machine-analysis-by-network-expect-local-valdis-krebs/comment-page-1/#comment-42461</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/2008/01/05/in-iowa-social-networks-beat-political-machine-analysis-by-network-expect-local-valdis-krebs/#comment-42461</guid>
		<description>This isn&#039;t exactly about social networks, but  close enough ...

In the Iowa caucuses, John Edwards got 30% of the delegates and Hillary Clinton got 29%. Had Clinton picked up one more delegate, her percentage would have also rounded up to 30%. &lt;a href=&quot;http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZWRhMjZmMzIzN2JkODQ5NjQyYWQ5YzU4MmRkOTUxMDg=&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here&lt;/a&gt; is a story (&quot;The Girl Who Sank Hillary&quot;) about how the decision of one caucus goer prevented Clinton from getting that 30% and an effective tie. 

I think the authors are attributing a little too much significance to that single vote. However, the story still provides a good description of interactions and decision-making at one caucus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t exactly about social networks, but  close enough &#8230;</p>
<p>In the Iowa caucuses, John Edwards got 30% of the delegates and Hillary Clinton got 29%. Had Clinton picked up one more delegate, her percentage would have also rounded up to 30%. <a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZWRhMjZmMzIzN2JkODQ5NjQyYWQ5YzU4MmRkOTUxMDg=" rel="nofollow">Here</a> is a story (&#8220;The Girl Who Sank Hillary&#8221;) about how the decision of one caucus goer prevented Clinton from getting that 30% and an effective tie. </p>
<p>I think the authors are attributing a little too much significance to that single vote. However, the story still provides a good description of interactions and decision-making at one caucus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
