http://youtube.com/watch?v=rVaw8WivNr8

I’ll delete this comment then? (of course I won’t)

“because you’re claiming this undecided mantle, and it’s clearly not reality.”

I will be so happy when the primary is over.

What’s worse is, the constant pummeling of this, all by men who support Obama, in a case when we’re supposed to be saying we’re beyond voting based on race or gender or any other identifying trait, in the absence of any evidence – since there isn’t any – to support that assertion can only mean one thing:

You all think I’d vote based on my gender.

Now – if you want to ask me, will you vote on your gender? Or race for that matter, just ask that. But also ask yourself, would you believe me anyway?

You place women in a lose lose – we can’t vote for Hillary because if we weren’t voting on gender well then of course we’d vote for Obama.

But if we DO vote for Hillary based on gender, then we must not know enough about Obama or care enough or I don’t even know what you are saying to people who really support Clinton – other than beating up on them.

You want substance about who will make a good leader?

None of this is about that.

Interestingly, for being such big supporters of Obama, maybe it’s that he can do things you can’t – which is to see other people’s perspectives and points of view, even if he doesn’t see something the same way. I guess we want in others, esp. our leaders, those things we ourselves lack.

Point to your evidence that what you call “my claim” isn’t reality.

In this case, you are all acting as badly as Tom and Dave when I was blogging on Wide Open and they and the conservative commenters would try to bash me until I would get off the fence about something.

What is with this disrespect for someone being undecided and freaking HONEST about that?

Seriously. You guys are having trouble with the fact that some people can’t make a decision – maybe because they don’t like either of their choices.

London?

Hello?