<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bush, Dann, WVWV: Breaking the law versus perception and image</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/2008/05/03/bush-dann-wvwv-breaking-the-law-versus-perception-and-image/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/2008/05/03/bush-dann-wvwv-breaking-the-law-versus-perception-and-image/</link>
	<description>&#34;She is very powerful, so be nice to her.&#34; Chancellor, Ohio Board of Regents, Eric Fingerhut</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:11:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Breaking the law versus impact, Part II &#124; Writes Like She Talks</title>
		<link>http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/2008/05/03/bush-dann-wvwv-breaking-the-law-versus-perception-and-image/comment-page-1/#comment-66767</link>
		<dc:creator>Breaking the law versus impact, Part II &#124; Writes Like She Talks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 15:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/2008/05/03/bush-dann-wvwv-breaking-the-law-versus-perception-and-image/#comment-66767</guid>
		<description>[...] In this post, I mentioned impact as one of those terms that gets extra meaning in a legal context compared to when we use it in a conversational sense. And in regard to the Women&#8217;s Voices Women&#8217;s vote controversy, it is impact that has everyone most concerned, but also ties into the concept of not always making illegal that which we don&#8217;t like, support or approve of. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In this post, I mentioned impact as one of those terms that gets extra meaning in a legal context compared to when we use it in a conversational sense. And in regard to the Women&#8217;s Voices Women&#8217;s vote controversy, it is impact that has everyone most concerned, but also ties into the concept of not always making illegal that which we don&#8217;t like, support or approve of. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy C</title>
		<link>http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/2008/05/03/bush-dann-wvwv-breaking-the-law-versus-perception-and-image/comment-page-1/#comment-66593</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 13:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/2008/05/03/bush-dann-wvwv-breaking-the-law-versus-perception-and-image/#comment-66593</guid>
		<description>Well said Jill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said Jill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->