You’ve complained previously about my plain speaking, in this case it is directly to the benefit of a cause you espouse. Direct action is what changes society, actions count.

Maybe WLST would be a more comfortable place without me around; all Jill has to do is ask and I’d disappear.

And you didn’t turn around and say let go of me I’m talking???

Hmmmm…..

You hang with the wrong people and you are responsible for standing up for you. Hillary doesn’t cure that and I am only responsible for my actions, not somebody’s relatives or others. I might look that person in the eye and say, ‘hey, I was listening to what this lady was saying.’

Cue Hallelujah chorus now.

This is my general reference to those times when people – male or female but in my mind, akin to Obama’s sweetie (and we know how I interpreted that and plenty of others chimed in to say the same AND to say differently) nod their head, say, “Yes yes now shush shush” and take hold of your elbow in an effort to have you just stop.

I’m not making a judgment about whether they should or they shouldn’t but rather, that that is the appearance to me of those media interpretations.

I agree with you – some dislikes are more equal than others – but I do a pretty decent job of trying to cover as much as I can – I can’t do it all and I do pick and choose. You are right and that’s what makes this not a press release blog. There’s a person behind it with all the flaws anyone wants to point out.

Also not sure where I stated or implied that Obama’s lead was “overwhelming.” It’s not even insurmountable. It’s just extremely unlikely that Hillary can win given that lead, yet she persists in making dishonest statements about the nature of the contest.

And yes we are all familiar with the cant that you don’t like either candidate. But some dislikes have been more equal than others.