So for Obama he has no obvious obligations to this entertainer, the entertainer will not have any impact on the white house.

The areas of concern are those that can influence the flow of capital, the laws and the economics of those laws.

The biggest issue on the table today is financial, we are functioning, but we are accumulating dept and we are very very wasteful.

The war, we need to step back the middle east needs something and its information, clear and objective, if they read our communications and look at our media we look like what?

Phil Donahue once said, Our show is broken, within the first 10-15 minutes we reach a solution and then have to keep talking about it. Think about that America!

It all about strong comprehension, if the solution is at hand it will be very detailed and multifaceted. What we need to do it think longer term and also be more risk adverse.

All issue need to be addressed in sections and in cyclical models, those involved become owners and have full access to all information.

If a group forms and has objection then those objection should be addressed, no in a public forum off the top of peoples heads, in writing and validity addressed objectively.

The objection to Obama associating with Ludacris, with respects to tangible societal impact, I say zero. I would say also that if groups kept bringing up such matters then the accumulative rating of that groups issues of concern would also be low.

We all have ten pounds of gray matter, if its wasted then the function of that would be what, it actually a mathematical function, that being the sum of the matter times the number of people involved. That’s wasted thought energy, I am seeing theory that is very high as a proportion in our society overall.

Just reign in the slurs and personal attacks and stop assuming you know everything about anyone based on a one-dimensional communication device like the Internet.