I’ll also quote a bit from the NYT post:

[University of Virginia Professor Jonathan] Haidt has conducted research in which liberals and conservatives were asked to project themselves into the minds of their opponents and answer questions about their moral reasoning. Conservatives, he said, prove quite adept at thinking like liberals, but liberals are consistently incapable of understanding the conservative point of view. “Liberals feel contempt for the conservative moral view, and that is very, very angering. Republicans are good at exploiting that anger,” he told me in a phone interview.

I don’t think Jill feels threatened. Based on the plethora of Palin posts, maybe obsessed. But not threatened.

I’m also pointing out the subtle sexist ways in which the McCain campaign folks refer to Palin. I don’t like it and I don’t think it’s right. But that’s me.

Finally – I’m a voter like anyone else and I cannot believe that a person who could be president will remain so unknown, again, esp. since the McCain campaign has helped push the “what do we really know about Obama” stuff.

Nevertheless, I’m sure the major network TV interviews are on the horizon, so I don’t buy into your “sexist” hysteria, and I predict she’ll do just fine. By contrast, I’m not sure that you’ll be fine if those interviews turn out well. Instead of 5 panicked posts a day about Palin, I’m worried you’ll up it to 20 jittery posts a day about Palin.

Take it easy on the caffeine.

Thanks so much for taking the time to read – I’m posting about the “deference” the campaign is demanding the media give Palin now. Did your read about that!?