Print This Post
Nov
4
From OH-01: Early voting favors Driehaus
Filed Under Congress, Elections, Ohio, Voting | Comments Off
This just in from Joe Wessels, communications director for Steve Driehaus:
We are still awaiting results in Ohio’s First Congressional District… But early voting shows us up 57 to Chabot’s 43 percent… with early voting/absentee voting and a small percentage of precincts reporting. It is an exciting time to be a Democrat – not only in this country – but in Ohio and in Cincinnati. Voters wanted a change and they are showing how badly they wanted it in big numbers. We are excited and very optimistic as we march toward getting final results…
Wow – if that holds, that is really incredible for that area. Other thoughts, Ohioans? Serious shifting, thinking or both.
By Jill Miller Zimon at 11:54 pm November 4th, 2008 in Congress, Elections, Ohio, Voting | Comments Off
Print This Post
Nov
4
Ohio, Ohio, Ohio. I know, Tim Russert said, Florida, Florida, Florida but the inside scoop here in the blogging war room is the fact that we’re hearing NPR talk a lot about Ohio, to their people in Ohio and to Ohioans who call in or are called.
Why the focus on Ohio? There’s a sense that Florida is more likely to go to McCain and Ohio will remain too close to call for a long time. Given what we know about the battles the Ohio Republican Party wants to wage/is waging, that’s probably a safe call.
Ha – and as I write, we’re hearing Andrea Seabrook is talking about Ohio – from Columbus. They’re talking about how no vote tallies will be released until all precincts closed and people had voted. She didn’t want results to go out and influence. She says that there are only very partial results in 20 of 88 counties.
I have to say, the micro-reporting on Ohio, being from Ohio, is kind of weird. But it is attention, right?
By Jill Miller Zimon at 10:09 pm November 4th, 2008 in Elections, Ohio, WH2008 | 1 Comment
Print This Post
Nov
4
Live-blog Election Night 2008
Filed Under Blogging, Politics, WH2008 | 3 Comments
By Jill Miller Zimon at 8:29 pm November 4th, 2008 in Blogging, Politics, WH2008 | 3 Comments
Print This Post
Nov
4
Ohio: Provision of provisional ballots is statewide problem
Filed Under Elections, Law, Ohio, Politics, Voting, WH2008 | 2 Comments
I just got off the phone with a communications person at the Ohio Secretary of State’s office whom I contacted after hearing the story (told to me by someone at the polls) detailed below. He told me that it is the single largest problem they’ve faced in Ohio today and it is a statewide problem. Included below the retelling of what’s been going on is the exact wording of a reminder sent by the SOS’s office just this morning explaining exactly how voter ID mismatch situations are to be handled and that regular ballots are to be used where possible.
This morning, I received a call from someone at a polling location in Gahanna, Ohio, a suburb of Columbus, which is in Franklin County. I was told that voters were coming out of the location with large orange sheets, which are given to people who cast provisional ballots. Some voters did not know why (they had not been told) they had to vote provisional. Others knew and those individuals then met with Joe the Voter Protection Lawyer (yes, his name really is Joe).
The cases appeared to primarily involve poll workers seeing one name on the driver’s license or ID and a different one on the registration rolls. However, issues with addresses not matching also have been reported (see this first-person report and video of this situation unfolding in Cleveland).
Eventually, Joe the Voter Protection Lawyer texted a poll observer on the inside of the poll. The poll observer observed the poll workers and judge and eventually, the poll observer spoke directly to the judge. The judge and the poll observer consulted the manuals and directives and, ultimately, the poll judge re-trained the poll workers so that they were not demanding that voters use provisionals when Ohio law does not require it.
Here is the information given to the board of elections just today (emphasis is mine):
Dear Directors, Deputy Directors and Members:
This is an important reminder that poll workers must properly implement Ohio’s voter ID laws, per the directions of the Ohio Secretary of State. Poll workers must also properly implement Ohio’s provisional ballot statute, using provisional ballots as a last resort.
BEFORE ISSUING A PROVISIONAL BALLOT:
Poll workers are required to determine if the voter is in the correct precinct. To do so, the poll worker must check the voter’s address against the street list for the precinct where they have offered to vote. If the voter is not in the correct precinct, you MUST direct the voter to the correct precinct, providing the location of that precinct as well. If a voter demands to vote a provisional ballot in the wrong precinct, the poll worker MUST notify the voter that the ballot will not be counted.
GENERAL RULE FOR OHIO DRIVER’S LICENSE OR PHOTO ID
As noted in Directive 2008-80: Voter Identification Requirements, in poll worker training courses, and in the Quick Reference Guide at every polling location, a voter presenting a valid Ohio driver’s license or Ohio photo ID must be provided a regular ballot even if the address on the ID and the address in the poll book are not identical. In such case, a poll worker must record the last 4 digits of the voter’s driver’s license or Ohio ID card number in polling place records as instructed by the board of elections.
Unless a voter fits into one of the following exceptions, poll workers MUST provide a regular ballot to any Ohioan with a valid Ohio driver’s license or Ohio photo ID, even if the address does not match address in the poll book.
THREE EXCEPTIONS TO THE GENERAL RULE
There are only three exceptions to this rule:
1. If the voter’s name is marked in the poll book as having a 60-day notice of elections returned as undeliverable, the address on the ID must match the address in the poll book for the person to vote a regular ballot;
2. If an acknowledgement notice is returned as undeliverable and the board of elections is not able to verify the person’s residence, this must be noted in the poll book; the first time that person votes, the person must vote a provisional ballot as well as providing acceptable proof of identity; or
3. If a confirmation notice is returned undeliverable, this must be noted in the poll book; the address on the voter’s Ohio driver’s license or Ohio photo ID must match the voter registration record for the person to vote a regular ballot.
INFORMATION NEED ONLY “CONFORM”
Please also note that the name and address need only “conform” to the records of the board, as follows:
For the purposes of verifying the identity of the voter by name, “conform” means that the document shall contain the same last name and the same first name or derivative of the first name as the first and last names appearing in the poll list or signature poll book. When a middle name or initial can be matched, the election official or poll worker should also verify the middle name or initial. Minor misspellings shall not preclude the use of a proffered ID for purposes of voting.
For the purposes of verifying the identity of the voter by address, “conform” does not mean an exact match, but rather, the form and content of the address can reasonably be determined to match the form and content of the address appearing in the poll list or signature poll book.
For example: My driver license says “Jill Miller Zimon.” My name on my voter registration is Jill M. Zimon. I am me, I’m not the walrus. I get a regular ballot (and I did – but I was prepared to rumble).
More reports of such problems:
Columbus Dispatch report of some confusion over provisionals
ProgressOhio reports on a Dispatch report that 15% of ballots being given our are provisionals at a poll location in a Krogers in Columbus
One county (Fairfield) alleged to improperly classify paper ballots as provisional ballots.
Just to explain again what’s up in Ohio: because of long lines, the SOS provided the option for people to use paper ballots. But these are not provisional – if a ballot is provisional, additional steps are followed and the ballot is marked as such. Just because it’s paper does not make it provisional. Read more here.
By Jill Miller Zimon at 7:06 pm November 4th, 2008 in Elections, Law, Ohio, Politics, Voting, WH2008 | 2 Comments
Print This Post
Nov
4
Ohio News Network real-time county by county, district by district results online
Filed Under Elections, Media, Ohio, Politics, Tech, WH2008 | Comments Off
From the inbox:
ONN (Ohio News Network) will once again feature exclusive Vote Tracker on Election Night for Ohio – on-air and on-line! Here is the link to preview and pass on. Obviously, data is zeroed but the map will begin to light up with data and color as polls close and results come in. It’s a powerful, real time application to track results county-by-county—and it let’s you be in control. We hope you use it tonight, find it valuable and share with others around Ohio and the country to monitor this key battleground state.
Vote Tracker features real-time county-by county results for Ohio for President
Vote Tracker features real-time district-by district results for all 18 Ohio Congressional Districts
Easy to read and interactive map let’s you see instantly the returns in Ohio-Look at the map for data of red, light red, blue and light blue for the data county-by-county and trends
-See the contested “leaning” counties at a glance with real-time results
-Click on any county for vote real-time vote totals
Or Track Multiple Races at One time on one easy screen
-You can select any combination of three races (President, statewide, key counties or Congressional races)Vote Tracker is not a projection tool. It is real-time results. The counties change as the vote totals are counted.
Ohio News Network works hard and I trust them to be a great resource. If you’re following battlegrounds, I do recommend checking this out.
By Jill Miller Zimon at 5:41 pm November 4th, 2008 in Elections, Media, Ohio, Politics, Tech, WH2008 | Comments Off
Print This Post
Nov
4
Tracking tool: An Orange America shows level of discourse on election today
Filed Under Elections, Media, Politics, Tech, WH2008 | 1 Comment
I don’t know how they do this stuff, but if you want to see some very cool tracking of what the discussion today looks like when comparing topics and candidates, check this out:
Project powered by: Tropicana
Freshly Squeezed Election Tweets
“We’re not red. We’re not blue. We’re 100% orange.”
Site URL:
www.AnOrangeAmerica.com
Tagline:
“A place where you can compare oranges to oranges.”
In an online space where lots of information is streaming in, users need help making sense of what is being said and what it means. The site itself is an abstract visualization of the aggregate conversation on the popular social media platform, Twitter. It shows frequency and context of election-related terms, live as they happen. Consider it a living information graphic: the picture changes over time as the conversation develops over time. The site will pull a continuous stream of tweets mentioning Obama and McCain. Each tweet is examined for certain key words and phrases. We have a pre-determined list, but we will be looking out for other words appearing with significant regularity and adding them to the tool. The data is represented as a series of interconnected half-circles. The bigger the “bubble” the more frequently the term is being used. Each bubble is colored red and blue: if the bubble is mostly red that means the term correlates more strongly with mentions of John McCain, and vice versa: the more blue, the more it’s associated with Barack Obama.
Keyword bubbles are themselves connected by half-circles (solid colors only), showing relationships between them. The stronger the connection, the thicker the line.
You can make it show what you want: show only tweets about Obama or McCain, about both, or about one but not the other. If you want to compare the current conversational landscape against a full day’s worth of tweets, or even three days, you can do that, too.
New Media Strategies is the main project manager and running all the community outreach. Many thanks to Leslie A. Bradshaw, NMS Community Manager, for the heads up on this very unique tool!
By Jill Miller Zimon at 1:04 pm November 4th, 2008 in Elections, Media, Politics, Tech, WH2008 | 1 Comment
Print This Post
Nov
4
Where the girls are: EMILY’s List offers tools to follow the female candidates
Filed Under Elections, Gender, Politics, Voting, Women | Comments Off
From an e-mail:
The EMILY’s List home page – www.emilyslist.org – will feature full results for all our women across the country. Click here to see our races. There are two senate, three governors and 26 house races (including our 5 endorsed incumbents).
Follow-along online or catch the latest on my twitter feed at http://twitter.com/votefem
For some good background browsing, check out the EMILY’s List Election Central pages at http://www.emilyslist.org/programs/election. You’ll find a plethora of polling and research on women voters.
You go girls.
By Jill Miller Zimon at 12:53 pm November 4th, 2008 in Elections, Gender, Politics, Voting, Women | Comments Off
Print This Post
Nov
4
Mandel benefits from charter school profiteers, energy corps that illuminate politicians w/money
Filed Under Education, Elections, Energy, Ethics, Government, OH17, Ohio, Pepper Pike, Politics, Utilities | Comments Off
A fierce debate in this legislative session over the regulation of the electricity industry and a potentially fiercer upcoming fight over education reforms have helped fuel record takes for Ohio House legislative races.
…
David Brennan, the largest charter-school operator in the state, has given about $345,000 to the House GOP effort, while William Lager, head of the online charter school ECOT, has given Republicans $155,000 and Democrats $35,700.
Political-action committees and executives from Ohio’s major power producers donated more than $645,000 to House Republicans this election cycle and more than $180,000 to Democrats. The legislature spent months this year debating new industry regulations.
The single largest 2008 election cycle individual donor contribution received by my state representative, Ohio House Rep. Josh Mandel (R, Lyndhurst, 17th district), whom I wrote about last week regarding how distinct our policy preferences are, is $10,000 from for-profit charter school operator, David Brennan. Likewise, Mandel received $5,000 from William Lager of the Electronic Classroom of Tomorrow (which is not for-profit).
So, when Mandel says on his campaign website,
Josh Mandel is committed to protecting our local schools from unfair schemes that send our property taxes to other parts of the state. Josh recognizes that strong schools are critical to revitalizing our area and giving our children a bright future. As our State Representative, Josh is working to protect our hard-earned dollars and improve the way schools are funded.
I’d remember the part about “unfair schemes that send our property taxes” to people and entities like David Brennan and White Hat Management, whose schools have been roundly criticized (including just last week for allegedly taking $29 million in taxpayer-funded payments for kids who weren’t attending) and the $20,000 Mandel received from Brennan and his wife in this cycle alone (they gave as generously in the 2006 campaign as well).
And when Mandel says that he, “recognizes that strong schools are critical to revitalizing our area and giving our children a bright future,” remember the $5,000 he’s received from the Electronic Classroom of Tomorrow.
In regard to keeping an eye on any pay to play possibilities from the energy industry, know first that Mandel is Vice Chair of the House Public Utilities Committee. He received that assignment as a freshman rep. According to the Secretary of State’s records, Mandel received $5,000 from Steven Smith of Schmack Bioenergy and a total of $5,000 from the Murrays of Murray Energy (a name that might be familiar to readers because of the coal mine collapse whose rescue efforts resulted in deaths).
I wonder if Mandel runs each of these through the flawed system that he recommended last year for checking companies with conflicts re: divesting from Iran and Sudan. Oops, the SEC took it offline because:
Because of the importance the SEC places on complete, accurate, and timely disclosure, we are particularly impressed with the concerns that have been expressed about the tool’s inability to access more current data about a company’s activities in a terrorist state since the date of their most recent annual report. Since more recent disclosure could include the fact that a company has completely terminated its activities in a country, that information could be material to a complete understanding of the disclosure in the last annual report.
To address these and related concerns, we are temporarily suspending the availability of the web tool while it undergoes reconstruction. We will work to improve the web tool so that it meets the various concerns that have been expressed. Alternatively, our staff is considering whether the use of interactive data tags applied by companies themselves could permit investors, analysts and others to easily discover this disclosure without need of an SEC-provided web tool at all. In the interim, the companies’ disclosure regarding their business contacts in the five nations will continue to be available through the SEC’s EDGAR database, and findable using our new full-text search capability.
The Commission staff will also consider whether to recommend a Concept Release on the question of how best to make public company disclosure of activities in terrorist states more accessible. The release would solicit public comment in a formal way, so that the Commission could ensure that all legitimate concerns can be met while providing better access to company disclosures on these topics.
Looks like politics as usual for the incumbent GOP legislator.
If you want to check all of a candidates’ contributions, start here.
By Jill Miller Zimon at 12:37 pm November 4th, 2008 in Education, Elections, Energy, Ethics, Government, OH17, Ohio, Pepper Pike, Politics, Utilities | Comments Off
Print This Post
Nov
4
First-person impact: How profound is the precipice of an Obama win
Filed Under Barack Obama, Elections, Politics, Race, Social Issues, WH2008 | 4 Comments
The first election in which I ever voted was twenty-eight years ago today. I voted for John Anderson, who was a third-party candidate in the race with incumbent Jimmy Carter and GOP challenger, Ronald Reagan. I was a freshman at Georgetown.
Today, I’m back in Washington, D.C. to cover the election returns tonight from the NPR studios. I love this city, always have, sliding doors life very likely would have me here.
So it was extremely auspicious that I received the following e-mail about an hour ago from one of my dearest college roommates. She tells a compelling, poignant and important story about her journey to today and she’s given me permission to share:
Dear friends on this auspicious day,
It’s 4:20 in the morning on election day. We’ve been waiting for this day for almost two years. Leila entered our bedroom 10 minutes ago looking for her favorite stuffed animal that she put on our bed for safekeeping. She’s got it now and is back in bed sleeping. I’m awake. I can’t sleep. So I’ve gotten up to write something that has been forming in my mind the last couple of weeks.
We have a postcard from Barack Obama on our fridge door. It’s one of those cards received months ago as a thank you for a donation. I didn’t want to throw the card away and I also didn’t want it to get buried in a growing pile of other mail “that I don’t know what to do with.” So, without much ado, I put it up on the fridge. There it is surrounded by school pictures of Leila’s white cousins, various friends, and pictures of her at earlier times in her life. A few weeks ago we were eating breakfast in the kitchen and Leila paused between bites of cereal to notice the man on our refrigerator. “That man on the refrigerator is Barack Obama,” she said “He looks like my brother.” Indeed he does. Like Barack, Leila was born of mixed heritage: a white birthmother, a black birthfather. Read more
By Jill Miller Zimon at 10:20 am November 4th, 2008 in Barack Obama, Elections, Politics, Race, Social Issues, WH2008 | 4 Comments
Print This Post
Nov
4
[video] The Great Kvetch and Jews for the Rapture
Filed Under Barack Obama, Campaigning, Elections, Israel, Jewish, John McCain, Politics, Religion, Sarah Palin, Voting, WH2008 | 4 Comments
I am so excited for this election to end because I am so tired of people, fellow Jews in particular, suggesting that I am an anti-Semite because I support Barack Obama. There’s been a lot of stupid stuff said during the last 20 months, but that suggestion is by far one of the worst. Here’s a great example of political sarcasm that says it all:
Jews for the Rapture. Oh yeah.
By Jill Miller Zimon at 9:36 am November 4th, 2008 in Barack Obama, Campaigning, Elections, Israel, Jewish, John McCain, Politics, Religion, Sarah Palin, Voting, WH2008 | 4 Comments
Print This Post
Nov
4
We are our democracy
Filed Under Blogging, democracy, Elections, Government, Ohio, Politics, Voting, WH2008 | 5 Comments
And that’s the whole idea.
Throughout the day, I’ll be posting examples of just how much our democracy depends on us to participate as much as possible, which unfortunately highlights what’s so wrong with a country that can’t accommodate itself when its residents do that democracy thing like…voting.
Some pre-8:00am examples:
Jill Foster interviews a first-time voter who is from a country that was so often at war, he could never vote.
George Nemeth advises everyone on Twitter who is voting in the Cleveland area to please tag their tweets with #clevote08 – and here are the results!
Human Folly has abandoned me for Miami where she’s going to wake up your corpus delecti if you don’t get up and out to vote.
NPR’s Google map app for voter reports shows Ohio to have yellow dots in a couple of places but Cleveland has a big huge red dot – I’ll check that out and write more later. Read more
By Jill Miller Zimon at 9:01 am November 4th, 2008 in Blogging, democracy, Elections, Government, Ohio, Politics, Voting, WH2008 | 5 Comments
Print This Post
Nov
4
The Participatory Class: Political blogs come of age this election year
Filed Under Blogging, Campaigning, Elections, Government, Ohio, Politics, Social Issues, Tech, Utilities, Voting, WH2008, Writing | Comments Off
But I think what they’ve written could apply to many of us who’ve been blogging the elections and explains the reason why traditional media outlets, my host for these posts – The Ruckus – included, as well as my host for election night, NPR, as well:
Here in the battleground of all battleground states, the people in charge of this soon-to-end presidential campaign are Chris Myers and Katie Stoynoff.
But Sens. John McCain and Barack Obama have never heard of them.
Myers, 33, is a lifelong Republican. Though he’s always been wary of McCain’s “Straight Talk Express,” he got onboard the moment it made room for Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin. “McCain could not have made a better pick,” says Myers, who lives in Toledo. On his community blog, Swamp Bubbles, where Palin is often maligned, Myers is her biggest defender.
Stoynoff, 32, meanwhile, is a die-hard Democrat. “Must have been born that way,” she jokes. Raised in the small town of Green, just outside Akron, she signed up with Obama’s campaign on Feb. 10, 2007, the day he announced his candidacy. That afternoon, Stoynoff logged on to Obama’s social networking site and formed an online group, Akron for Obama.
Though they share almost nothing in common politically, Myers and Stoynoff are part of a growing set of Americans, “a participatory class,” as Lee Rainie of the Pew Internet & American Life Project calls it.
Online social networking sites — socnets, from community blogs to YouTube — are changing how the members of this class get their news, whom they trust to provide it and how they act on it. Whatever the source, they comfortably and routinely comment on the news, reproduce it, then forward it to relatives, friends, co-workers and, yes, strangers.
The relationship between candidates and their supporters has shifted, too. Supporters see themselves less as agents of campaigns but as independent of them.
The concluding graphs of the article show that the reporter gets it, as do the blog authors: Read more
By Jill Miller Zimon at 8:35 am November 4th, 2008 in Blogging, Campaigning, Elections, Government, Ohio, Politics, Social Issues, Tech, Utilities, Voting, WH2008, Writing | Comments Off
Print This Post
Nov
4
Newspaper endorsement tally as of today: Obama 273, McCain 142
Filed Under Barack Obama, Endorsements, John McCain, Media, Politics, WH2008 | Comments Off
Obama’s lopsided margin, including most of the major papers that have decided so far, is in stark contrast to John Kerry barely edging George W. Bush in endorsements of dailies in 2004 by 213 to 205.
…
Well over 50 papers have now switched to Obama from Bush in 2004, with less than half a dozen flipping to McCain. The latest: the daily in Dick Cheney’s hometown of Casper, Wyoming and the Clarion-Ledger in Jackson, Mississippi. In addition, several top papers that went for Bush in 2004 have now chosen not to endorse this year, the latest being the Indianapolis Star in key swing state Indiana.
And another article stating its belief that endorsements do matter:
The amount of influence the endorsement has, however, depends largely on how unexpected (or “credible,” to use the authors’ term) the endorsement was. If a newspaper editorial page is perceived as liberal and endorses the Democratic candidate, for example, the endorsement has little effect, and likewise with a conservative editorial page endorsing a Republican candidate. Endorsements from newspapers seen as politically moderate, or those usually believed to be in the opposing political camp of their presidential pick, are much more influential. In other words, readers seek guidance from editorial pages on how they should vote, because they believe the writers are more informed about the issues at play. But readers still discount editorial page endorsements according to any bias they perceive in the newspaper’s political leanings.
That sounds about right to me (and hattip to Have Coffee Will Write who first told me about that article).
By Jill Miller Zimon at 12:39 am November 4th, 2008 in Barack Obama, Endorsements, John McCain, Media, Politics, WH2008 | Comments Off
Print This Post
Nov
4
Republican Jewish Coalition should be ashamed
Filed Under Barack Obama, Campaigning, Elections, John McCain, Media, Politics, WH2008 | 2 Comments
There’s been an enormous amount of cyberspace and print space taken up by article trying to devine which way the Jewish vote will go. Barely a day goes by that I’m not asked some version of that question. And that’s okay – I don’t mind.
What I do mind is the disgusting way in which people who call themselves Jews tell other Jews what they should fear, or call other Jews anti-Semites because we believe it’s our duty to criticize Israel and the United States when we disagree with policy preferences and tactics and strategies. The perpetuation of dissent among Jews, by Jews or non-Jews, is, in my opinion, nearly unforgiveable.
And I thank Lilatovcocktail for this exellcent post on the issue:
Jewish voters favor Obama over McCain by a ratio of more than 3-to-1, according to Gallup poll results released Thursday. Republicans are desperate, sure, but their tactics stink. They’re unlikely to sway Jewish voters at this point, but they could have lasting repercussions within the Jewish community.
Please read her entire post, which includes text and images of several of the reprehensible ads the RJC has run this year.
By Jill Miller Zimon at 12:29 am November 4th, 2008 in Barack Obama, Campaigning, Elections, John McCain, Media, Politics, WH2008 | 2 Comments
Print This Post
Nov
4
Former GOP Governor Jane Swift (MA) blogs for McCain
Filed Under Barack Obama, Campaigning, Elections, John McCain, Politics, Sarah Palin, WH2008 | 4 Comments
It’s surprising to me in what she doesn’t say about Sarah Palin and what she does say about Obama and experience. From BlogHer.com:
Barack Obama, while an inspiring figure in American politics, simply has not done the same. In his time in the U.S. Senate (just under four years), he has largely towed his party’s line — this year, earning the title of most liberal senator from the non-partisan National Journal — and has introduced just two bills that have made it into law. It’s a record that may work for the junior senator from Illinois, but exemplifies his insufficient experience, both in terms of quantity and quality, where the position of commander in chief is concerned. It leaves the contrast between him and Senator McCain looking especially stark, in a time where America needs a leader ready to go on Day One, equipped with the demonstrated skills required to bring Americans together and move this country forward.
Maybe not quite as week as Dick Cheney’s delight for the ticket, but not much stronger either.
By Jill Miller Zimon at 12:18 am November 4th, 2008 in Barack Obama, Campaigning, Elections, John McCain, Politics, Sarah Palin, WH2008 | 4 Comments


