Print This Post Print This Post

The thing finally passed and got signed, but Ohio Governor Ted Strickland used his line-item veto 13 timesTruckers are thrilled that they can drive 65 like everyone else on the Ohio portions of the interstate highways, but the Ohio Highway Patrol doesn’t share the glee:

Opponents, including the Ohio Highway Patrol, wanted no part of that. They said that faster trucks lead to more problems.

However, research collected by OOIDA concludes that the difference in vehicle speeds, not excessive speed, contributes to accidents. Collisions occur when trucks and cars must change lanes and pass more frequently.

If what’s in the Cleveland Leader is right, however, I’m really glad I’m getting into electoral politics:

Under the new bill, truckers face fee increases for vehicle titles and tags, so the speed increase was seen as compensation.

We’ll pay more money if you let us go faster?

What exactly do tag and title fees have to do with the speed of a vehicle and safety?

If the facts demonstrate that this split speed thing was no good and not safe to begin with, then why do you have to pretend that the quid pro quo was more fees for faster trucks?

Just. Make them. Separate.

Fees need to go up? They go up.

Speeds should be allowed to go up? Then they can go up.

Why this “the speed increase was seen as compensation”?

Bookmark and Share

By Jill Miller Zimon at 1:37 pm April 3rd, 2009 in Business, Ethics, Government, Law, leadership, Ohio, Politics, Statehouse, Transportation 

Comments

3 Responses to “Details on Strickland’s 13 ODOT budget vetoes; truckers trade money for speed”

  1. 1 Laura Ashley on April 3rd, 2009 1:51 pm

    I have to disagree on their assumption that there will be more accidents if the trucks go faster. I live in Oregon where trucks are allowed to go 65, and we don’t have an excessive amount of accidents due to speed. Stupidity yes, speed no.

    Governments will always keep trying to find ways to get more money from the people. Especially with the current governments spending rampage. The money has to come from somewhere. And if Obama is going to “lower” taxes, then they will just need to find other places to make us pay to make up for that, and I am sure that we will end up paying much more in other costs than we will saving $40 a month in tax cuts.

  2. 2 Jill Miller Zimon on April 3rd, 2009 1:53 pm

    I don’t mean to insult you Laura but I can’t tell if you are spam or not because of that second paragraph – it really doesn’t relate to this move by Ohio at all. But, ok – it stays for now. Thanks – esp if you aren’t spam.

  3. 3 Eugene on April 3rd, 2009 5:33 pm

    Thanks for the link, Jill. Hope all is well :)

  • Writes Like She Tumbls

  • Voted into Top 25 Political Mom Blogs

  • Now on sale-WLST essay included!

  • Find Me On

  • RSS Posts About Pepper Pike City Council

  • 2010 WE Magazine 101 Women Bloggers to Watch

    Jill Miller Zimon,Blogging,WE Magazine
  • Category Specific RSS

    Pepper Pike
    Cleveland+
    Politics
    Women
    Ohio
    Elections
    Law
    Jewish
  • BlogHer Guide to Political Blogging

  • Calendar

    April 2009
    S M T W T F S
    « Mar   May »
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    2627282930  
  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Meta

  • Notorious Women through History


  • Our Bodies, Our Blog


  • Spam Blocked

"));