Comments on: The case for the Presidential Commission on Women http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/2009/04/06/the-case-for-the-presidential-commission-on-women/ "She is very powerful, so be nice to her." Former Chancellor, Ohio Board of Regents, Eric Fingerhut Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:51:17 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: oengus http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/2009/04/06/the-case-for-the-presidential-commission-on-women/comment-page-1/#comment-281982 oengus Tue, 07 Apr 2009 18:46:42 +0000 http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/?p=13082#comment-281982 Wouldn’t that be a back slide? The original effort evolved into a larger dispersed network of regional commissions. That being the National Association of commission for Woman. Notice that your state has no commission. I do not think that a presidential commission will fly, I do not think this administration is without information, we are light years ahead of the generation that created the first. Of the specific topic, the British passed equal right legislation in 2006, broad legislation and then a commission to address all those rights as they are defined within the law. That’s the key, that the laws are not long and complex legal essays. That the laws are open to interpretation but also not open to the extent as to burden the courts excessively. That is a process driven public commission that did not feel like it needed to keep looking at equality. It just defined it and then offers resolution, by clearly displaying the laws and then offering avenues of discussion and recourse. It sound like a power play to me, a group that would like to get closer to the presidency and not much else. I am actually an advocate of an equal right amendment, it need to be clear and concise. It could be modeled after the British, why reinvent the wheel. Wouldn’t that be a back slide? The original effort evolved into a larger dispersed network of regional commissions. That being the National Association of commission for Woman. Notice that your state has no commission.

I do not think that a presidential commission will fly, I do not think this administration is without information, we are light years ahead of the generation that created the first.

Of the specific topic, the British passed equal right legislation in 2006, broad legislation and then a commission to address all those rights as they are defined within the law. That’s the key, that the laws are not long and complex legal essays. That the laws are open to interpretation but also not open to the extent as to burden the courts excessively. That is a process driven public commission that did not feel like it needed to keep looking at equality. It just defined it and then offers resolution, by clearly displaying the laws and then offering avenues of discussion and recourse.

It sound like a power play to me, a group that would like to get closer to the presidency and not much else.

I am actually an advocate of an equal right amendment, it need to be clear and concise. It could be modeled after the British, why reinvent the wheel.

]]>