<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;ll be on CNN.com/LIVE today discussing Sarah Palin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/2009/07/06/ill-be-on-cnn-comlive-today-discussing-sarah-palin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/2009/07/06/ill-be-on-cnn-comlive-today-discussing-sarah-palin/</link>
	<description>&#34;She is very powerful, so be nice to her.&#34; Chancellor, Ohio Board of Regents, Eric Fingerhut</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:44:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jill Miller Zimon</title>
		<link>http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/2009/07/06/ill-be-on-cnn-comlive-today-discussing-sarah-palin/comment-page-1/#comment-355797</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill Miller Zimon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 03:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/?p=13633#comment-355797</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Anastasia - here&#039;s something you really should read, an NPR oped written by someone I know, called, &quot;Hot and Bothering: Media Treatment of Sarah Palin&quot;:

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=106384060

It really covers/emphasizes how inappropriate the media has been, but not only to Palin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Anastasia &#8211; here&#8217;s something you really should read, an NPR oped written by someone I know, called, &#8220;Hot and Bothering: Media Treatment of Sarah Palin&#8221;:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=106384060" rel="nofollow">http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=106384060</a></p>
<p>It really covers/emphasizes how inappropriate the media has been, but not only to Palin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill Miller Zimon</title>
		<link>http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/2009/07/06/ill-be-on-cnn-comlive-today-discussing-sarah-palin/comment-page-1/#comment-355794</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill Miller Zimon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 03:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/?p=13633#comment-355794</guid>
		<description>Nordette - thanks for watching and commenting. Yeah, you know - I think she has gone overboard with the suggestion that people shouldn&#039;t even be filing ethics violations - I mean, she&#039;s trying to play the victim AND be the bully at the same time, lol.  But, whatever - as a lawyer, I know - the laws are there and people can and will use them. She&#039;s really shooting blanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nordette &#8211; thanks for watching and commenting. Yeah, you know &#8211; I think she has gone overboard with the suggestion that people shouldn&#8217;t even be filing ethics violations &#8211; I mean, she&#8217;s trying to play the victim AND be the bully at the same time, lol.  But, whatever &#8211; as a lawyer, I know &#8211; the laws are there and people can and will use them. She&#8217;s really shooting blanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill Miller Zimon</title>
		<link>http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/2009/07/06/ill-be-on-cnn-comlive-today-discussing-sarah-palin/comment-page-1/#comment-355791</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill Miller Zimon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 03:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/?p=13633#comment-355791</guid>
		<description>Maria - that&#039;s also a great catch re: have they &quot;run her&quot; already?  Very interesting.  I objected to that last year when she clearly was the VP, but still...good thought. Thanks for watching and commenting. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maria &#8211; that&#8217;s also a great catch re: have they &#8220;run her&#8221; already?  Very interesting.  I objected to that last year when she clearly was the VP, but still&#8230;good thought. Thanks for watching and commenting. <img src='http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill Miller Zimon</title>
		<link>http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/2009/07/06/ill-be-on-cnn-comlive-today-discussing-sarah-palin/comment-page-1/#comment-355789</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill Miller Zimon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 03:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/?p=13633#comment-355789</guid>
		<description>Lila in #22 - that is a great pick-up, wow, re: the VERY gendered-response/rationale she gave. Interesting.  HOWEVER - couldn&#039;t we say that we would hope that all PARENTS might use such a rationale? :)  What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lila in #22 &#8211; that is a great pick-up, wow, re: the VERY gendered-response/rationale she gave. Interesting.  HOWEVER &#8211; couldn&#8217;t we say that we would hope that all PARENTS might use such a rationale? <img src='http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lilatovcocktail</title>
		<link>http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/2009/07/06/ill-be-on-cnn-comlive-today-discussing-sarah-palin/comment-page-1/#comment-354179</link>
		<dc:creator>lilatovcocktail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 10:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/?p=13633#comment-354179</guid>
		<description>Oh, Anastasia, I&#039;ve missed your insight and wit!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, Anastasia, I&#8217;ve missed your insight and wit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anastasia p</title>
		<link>http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/2009/07/06/ill-be-on-cnn-comlive-today-discussing-sarah-palin/comment-page-1/#comment-353763</link>
		<dc:creator>Anastasia p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/?p=13633#comment-353763</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s the issue I have with speculation about whether Palin would be getting all this attention if she were a man: of course she would if she were the radically underqualified surprise vice-presidential choice who went out and ran the kind of campaign she did, helped lose the election for her ticket and still was annointed the party&#039;s future star — and then quit with her resume mostly still empty. The country would be buzzing.

And here&#039;s a further issue: Palin was selected to be McCain&#039;s running mate BECAUSE she is a woman. No man with her background and resume would have been picked. So it&#039;s definitely something you have to consider in the mix.

oh, and as for the &quot;speculation.&quot; No one has said for a fact that she is udner investigation and her lawyer threatened to sue a blogger for saying &quot;There are rumors out there.&quot; In fact, there are. And her lawyer did the worst thing possible by acting like a bully, and by giving a way too long protest-too-much detailed breakdown of the so-called Housegate scandal which, given Palin&#039;s many apparent ethical lapses, may not even be the issue.

Amd Nordette, there&#039;s a very simple way Palin could have disccolved any &quot;cloud of speculation&quot; : she could have given an actua REASON for quitting.

I wish I had gotten to see you, Jill, but I just found out about this when I got home. I will look for the link. That&#039;s great, and congratulations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the issue I have with speculation about whether Palin would be getting all this attention if she were a man: of course she would if she were the radically underqualified surprise vice-presidential choice who went out and ran the kind of campaign she did, helped lose the election for her ticket and still was annointed the party&#8217;s future star — and then quit with her resume mostly still empty. The country would be buzzing.</p>
<p>And here&#8217;s a further issue: Palin was selected to be McCain&#8217;s running mate BECAUSE she is a woman. No man with her background and resume would have been picked. So it&#8217;s definitely something you have to consider in the mix.</p>
<p>oh, and as for the &#8220;speculation.&#8221; No one has said for a fact that she is udner investigation and her lawyer threatened to sue a blogger for saying &#8220;There are rumors out there.&#8221; In fact, there are. And her lawyer did the worst thing possible by acting like a bully, and by giving a way too long protest-too-much detailed breakdown of the so-called Housegate scandal which, given Palin&#8217;s many apparent ethical lapses, may not even be the issue.</p>
<p>Amd Nordette, there&#8217;s a very simple way Palin could have disccolved any &#8220;cloud of speculation&#8221; : she could have given an actua REASON for quitting.</p>
<p>I wish I had gotten to see you, Jill, but I just found out about this when I got home. I will look for the link. That&#8217;s great, and congratulations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nordette aka Verite</title>
		<link>http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/2009/07/06/ill-be-on-cnn-comlive-today-discussing-sarah-palin/comment-page-1/#comment-353554</link>
		<dc:creator>Nordette aka Verite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/?p=13633#comment-353554</guid>
		<description>You were wonderful, Jill. I like what you said about welcoming the FBI&#039;s announcement that it is not investigating her. No need for people to live under a cloud of speculation, even people like Palin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You were wonderful, Jill. I like what you said about welcoming the FBI&#8217;s announcement that it is not investigating her. No need for people to live under a cloud of speculation, even people like Palin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria Niles</title>
		<link>http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/2009/07/06/ill-be-on-cnn-comlive-today-discussing-sarah-palin/comment-page-1/#comment-353516</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria Niles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/?p=13633#comment-353516</guid>
		<description>Great job, Jill! 

One thing I noticed was that Matt brought up an analogy that was prevalent from conservatives during the &#039;08 campaign that essentially Palin was running against Obama and that her experience and choices should be weighed against his. It&#039;s almost as if in their minds she already has run for president (since they didn&#039;t really support McCain) so perhaps that makes it a bit easier to envision this as a strategic move for 2012 (though clearly Matt, does not).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great job, Jill! </p>
<p>One thing I noticed was that Matt brought up an analogy that was prevalent from conservatives during the &#8216;08 campaign that essentially Palin was running against Obama and that her experience and choices should be weighed against his. It&#8217;s almost as if in their minds she already has run for president (since they didn&#8217;t really support McCain) so perhaps that makes it a bit easier to envision this as a strategic move for 2012 (though clearly Matt, does not).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LilaTovCocktail</title>
		<link>http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/2009/07/06/ill-be-on-cnn-comlive-today-discussing-sarah-palin/comment-page-1/#comment-353413</link>
		<dc:creator>LilaTovCocktail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 20:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/?p=13633#comment-353413</guid>
		<description>Congrats, Jill, That&#039;s very, very cool.

My thoughts on Palin&#039;s resignation are more inklings than hypotheses, but I think there are clearly deeper gender politics going on. 

Palin said that when she asked her family if she should resign, they said something like &quot;Yeah,&quot; &quot;yeah,&quot; &quot;yeah,&quot; &quot;yeah,&quot; and &quot;Hell, yeah!&quot; (The latter, I presume, was her husband.)

That anecdote, and its public retelling,  obliquely points to traditional gender roles as the rationale for her resignation.  Being at home with family is a better, more obvious choice (hell, yeah) than being in the governor&#039;s office. 

Strange that none of her kids or her husband said, &quot;But what about your proposed blah-blah legislation? Don&#039;t you want to stay until that gets passed?&quot;  Aren&#039;t they aware of, or don&#039;t they value, her political goals?  I would they could hardly have lived with her for all this time without being very aware of her agenda.

But at the moment, SHE&#039;s pretending she doesn&#039;t have an agenda, and the press is letting her. If Palin were male there would be more pressure on her to answer those &quot;Why are you really leaving?&quot; and &quot;What are you going to do with your time/energy/ambition/power?&quot; kinds of media questions.

Instead, the media coverage has accepted Palin&#039;s own crypto-conservative implication that it&#039;s natural for a woman to want to relinquish her right to wield power. As Palin is she&#039;s saying, &quot;You guys were right; all this governing is too much for little ole me.&quot;

But as we all saw during the election, Palin has more than her share of megalomania and will-to-power. And that makes her attempt to gracefully retire from public life seem like a sham, a subterfuge for some other motive.  But what?  

Media speculation has been that she was under investigation (apparently she&#039;s not) or planning to run for the presidency (but wouldn&#039;t her candidacy be stronger if she ran as governor rather than ex-governor?)

I don&#039;t have a clue. But I do have the unshakable gut feeling that she is being very disingenuous about the whole thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats, Jill, That&#8217;s very, very cool.</p>
<p>My thoughts on Palin&#8217;s resignation are more inklings than hypotheses, but I think there are clearly deeper gender politics going on. </p>
<p>Palin said that when she asked her family if she should resign, they said something like &#8220;Yeah,&#8221; &#8220;yeah,&#8221; &#8220;yeah,&#8221; &#8220;yeah,&#8221; and &#8220;Hell, yeah!&#8221; (The latter, I presume, was her husband.)</p>
<p>That anecdote, and its public retelling,  obliquely points to traditional gender roles as the rationale for her resignation.  Being at home with family is a better, more obvious choice (hell, yeah) than being in the governor&#8217;s office. </p>
<p>Strange that none of her kids or her husband said, &#8220;But what about your proposed blah-blah legislation? Don&#8217;t you want to stay until that gets passed?&#8221;  Aren&#8217;t they aware of, or don&#8217;t they value, her political goals?  I would they could hardly have lived with her for all this time without being very aware of her agenda.</p>
<p>But at the moment, SHE&#8217;s pretending she doesn&#8217;t have an agenda, and the press is letting her. If Palin were male there would be more pressure on her to answer those &#8220;Why are you really leaving?&#8221; and &#8220;What are you going to do with your time/energy/ambition/power?&#8221; kinds of media questions.</p>
<p>Instead, the media coverage has accepted Palin&#8217;s own crypto-conservative implication that it&#8217;s natural for a woman to want to relinquish her right to wield power. As Palin is she&#8217;s saying, &#8220;You guys were right; all this governing is too much for little ole me.&#8221;</p>
<p>But as we all saw during the election, Palin has more than her share of megalomania and will-to-power. And that makes her attempt to gracefully retire from public life seem like a sham, a subterfuge for some other motive.  But what?  </p>
<p>Media speculation has been that she was under investigation (apparently she&#8217;s not) or planning to run for the presidency (but wouldn&#8217;t her candidacy be stronger if she ran as governor rather than ex-governor?)</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have a clue. But I do have the unshakable gut feeling that she is being very disingenuous about the whole thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill Miller Zimon</title>
		<link>http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/2009/07/06/ill-be-on-cnn-comlive-today-discussing-sarah-palin/comment-page-1/#comment-353409</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill Miller Zimon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 20:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com/?p=13633#comment-353409</guid>
		<description>Thanks everybody!!  Your input is so intelligent, and varied, great to have a variety of POVs.

About the feed of the video: it is only shown on Cnn.com online - you go to http://cnn.com/live1.

I will be sent a link to the show eventually and will post that once I get it.

About the point guard point - yeah, you know - I could not let that one go. I&#039;d been thinking about it since I heard it last week.  Yes, LeBron knows when to pass, but to be allowed this kind of decision to change directions and &quot;pass&quot; the ball? You need to be a crazy one of a kind WITNESS great point guard.  Not just a &quot;good point guard&quot; who is passing because of the pressure after only 2 1/2 quarters (aka years) of play, versus being in there, hanging in there, for all four.

Just my O obviously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks everybody!!  Your input is so intelligent, and varied, great to have a variety of POVs.</p>
<p>About the feed of the video: it is only shown on Cnn.com online &#8211; you go to <a href="http://cnn.com/live1" rel="nofollow">http://cnn.com/live1</a>.</p>
<p>I will be sent a link to the show eventually and will post that once I get it.</p>
<p>About the point guard point &#8211; yeah, you know &#8211; I could not let that one go. I&#8217;d been thinking about it since I heard it last week.  Yes, LeBron knows when to pass, but to be allowed this kind of decision to change directions and &#8220;pass&#8221; the ball? You need to be a crazy one of a kind WITNESS great point guard.  Not just a &#8220;good point guard&#8221; who is passing because of the pressure after only 2 1/2 quarters (aka years) of play, versus being in there, hanging in there, for all four.</p>
<p>Just my O obviously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->