By BoLOHLONE payday loans

Print This Post Print This Post

Just tell me – did ya slam The New Republic when they put this on their cover in April 2008:

Because if ya didn’t, I’m not feeling much empathy for your complaining now about this Newsweek cover of Michelle Bachmann:

Feel sorry for Newsweek that this is what they’re doing for traffic. Or they have lousy photogs.  Or they won’t pay for decent portraits. Or maybe this is what Bachmann gave them. I don’t know – I haven’t researched the backstory yet so if you know, feel free to enlighten.  But again, if the hysterical Hillary didn’t bother you, you’ve got nothing to complain about with the Bachmann cover.

Bookmark and Share

By Jill Miller Zimon at 9:22 pm August 8th, 2011 in Gender, Hillary Clinton, Media, michele bachmann, Politics, Sexism 

Comments

6 Responses to “Yea yea yea – Clinton The Hysterical, 2008, Now Bachmann The Rage, 2011”

  1. 1 Brandy on August 9th, 2011 1:06 am

    HOnestly it looks like almost any picture I have seen if her in the past that’s just her face! Everyone remember her rebuttal speech where she stated strangely off camera the whole time? How about every speech she has ever made like say the one recent one about letting the debt ceiling situation falter cause it would have no effect in us? She is crazy and her looks match the crazy an irresponsible rhetoric she spews on an almost daily bases. That should be what the article is a out really not how crazy her face looks

  2. 2 CNB on August 9th, 2011 7:09 pm

    Yes, that is exactly what Michele Bachmann looks like every time she appears on TV to spew nonsense. Her eyes always bug out of her head. She is still saying that the reason the U.S. was downgraded was BECAUSE we raised the debt ceiling! She thought we would NOT default if we didn’t raise the debt ceiling and she would never admit that the reason we were downgraded was because of her and her crazy tea party colleagues fighting everything that Barack Obama wanted to do.

  3. 3 Melinda on August 9th, 2011 8:47 pm

    This is really what she looks like…I think that says it all! God help us if she runs for President. Does she remind anyone of the Stepford Wives?

  4. 4 Ben Gazara on August 10th, 2011 7:57 pm

    Honestly…who the heck reads either of those magazines? Newsweek has become a left leaning rag ever since the 90s and the New Republic has always been a right wing Political magazine! The New Republic does NOT call itself a new magazine as does Newsweek! Keep apples and oranges separated….didn’t you learn that in grade school??

  5. 5 Jill on August 15th, 2011 8:45 am

    Thanks for the comments. I have read that a lot of people feel that she really does look that way – but I keep thinking, well – that’s what we’ve seen published as far as what she looks like – I’ve not seen her in person. But even more so, during Thursday night’s debate? She didn’t look like that even once. So…regardless of whether the magazines are widely read or not, I still think the matter of what the media decides to publish is relevant. I guess we’ll have to keep watching and checking it out.

  6. 6 Foraker on August 15th, 2011 5:38 pm

    I honestly don’t think that this photo makes her look crazy. I don’t really understand the fuss, she looks pretty normal to me.

    I would expect more outrage over the title of the article, Queen of Rage. Really?!?

  • How Low Can We Go?

  • Mothers Mean Business When It Comes to Governing

  • Find Me On

  • RSS Posts About Pepper Pike City Council

  • 2011 Campaign Innovator Award

  • Category Specific RSS

    Pepper Pike
    Cleveland+
    Politics
    Women
    Ohio
    Elections
    Law
    Jewish
  • Calendar

    August 2011
    S M T W T F S
    « Jul   Sep »
     123456
    78910111213
    14151617181920
    21222324252627
    28293031  
  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Meta

  • Search Ohio Blogs

    BlogNetNews.com

    media_bloggers.bmp

    BlogBurst.com
  • Notorious Women through History


  • Our Bodies, Our Blog


"));