Journalist of the Month
The Fix: Best Ohio Political Blogs-2009
The Fix: Best-named blog
2008 Most Influential Person
The New York Times on The New Momism in Politics
The New York Times on Ohio Midterms
The Plain Dealer on electing women The Jewish Weekly on Twitter, Gaza & Israel
The Washington Post on Obama's influence on parenting
Your Elected Officials
- How Low Can We Go?
- Another Bucket List Item To Be Achieved!
- Prescription Drug Abuse: Who do you know who is “Legally Addicted”?
- Never Giving Up on Making the Ideal Real
- Journalism? Social Media? What the hell is that thing?
- The Power of the Civic Commons – Watch It
- Sanford, New York Doesn’t Need A Ban on Fracking Talk – They Need the Civic Commons
- One Small Step for Hello Kitty, One Giant Step for Girls in Science
- Statement from Ohio Board of Education President, Debe Terhar, on Hitler Facebook Post
- Statement to Ohio Board of Education February 11, 2013 Meeting
- How Low Can We Go? (1)
- yiran: asasa
- Another Bucket List Item To Be Achieved! (1)
- Beatrice L.: It seems like Gilbert doesn’t care one bit about the ill-will he’s...
- Statement to Ohio Board of Education February 11, 2013 Meeting (3)
- Eric: RE: “ignorance and ideology that only serves to make Americans more uninformed”...
- The Power of the Civic Commons – Watch It (2)
- Statement from Ohio Board of Education President, Debe Terhar, on Hitler Facebook Post (4)
- One Small Step for Hello Kitty, One Giant Step for Girls in Science (1)
- up2jj: It’s really funny!
- How Low Can We Go? (1)
I’ve always felt that even when I’m disagreeing with people simply because we have different perspectives on the same subject matter, and maybe I’m talking about a lot of people in that “we” and I’m the only one seeing something the way I’m seeing it, it’s necessarily because of some flaw in how I’m seeing things – or a flaw in how they’re seeing things. It’s more, in my view, that I’ve not explained what I’m seeing in a way that they can see it too – even if they still won’t accept it. But I’ve also always believed that so long as what I was reasoning had reasoning, I didn’t have to give up that perspective – even if I compromise on a solution. And in fact, just contributing the different perspective can change an outcome enough to be satisfactory, even if I don’t get the full change in alignment with how I see things.
Today, thanks to a very savvy organizational behavior guy I’ve met through my work with the EfficientGovNetwork, I learned the term, positive deviant (see also positive deviance) and I am absolutely convinced that that’s an apt description of the role I often play. It’s similar to the notion of disruption, something I also like.
Neither concept is about eliminating anyone or any other particular way of seeing or doing, but rather, it’s about expanding the ways in which groups in particular view whatever it is they’re working on and reach solutions. I think of it as a The Gods Must Be Crazy kind of injection of new ways of thinking about life and all that we don’t know.
Positive deviant. I really really like that.
By Jill Miller Zimon at 7:30 pm July 25th, 2012 in Government
How Low Can We Go?
Mothers Mean Business When It Comes to Governing
Find Me On
2011 Campaign Innovator Award
Category Specific RSSPepper Pike
Notorious Women through History
Our Bodies, Our Blog